Canada lets Cherry Blossom melt away
This week, Hershey quietly announced the discontinuation of Cherry Blossom, a cherished chocolate treat and, in essence, a Canadian icon. While the news has been met with a mix of nostalgia and indifference, the end of Cherry Blossom marks yet another chapter in the ongoing challenges facing food manufacturing in Canada.
Cherry Blossom's story is deeply rooted in Canadian history. First produced in the 1890s by the Walter M. Lowney Company in Sherbrooke, Quebec, it was a proud Canadian invention. In 1989, Hershey Canada acquired the Lowney brand, moving production to its Smiths Falls, Ontario facility. Featuring a cherry in syrup surrounded by peanuts and chocolate, Cherry Blossom offered a distinctive taste that resonated with generations. However, when the Smiths Falls plant closed in 2012, production shifted to the United States. The move signaled the beginning of the end for the candy's Canadian identity.
READ: U.S. tariffs could become catalyst to bolster Canadian food supply chains, experts say
Hershey did not provide a detailed explanation for discontinuing Cherry Blossom, but the likely culprit is declining demand. Over time, Cherry Blossom became a relic, fondly remembered but seldom purchased, particularly by younger Canadians. For many, it was the candy their grandparents enjoyed, not a treat they would buy for themselves. The brand's inability to attract new generations of consumers sealed its fate.
This underscores a critical issue: food manufacturing in Canada is at a crossroads. The loss of iconic brands like Cherry Blossom reflects a broader trend. If Canadian food manufacturers fail to remain competitive, they risk losing not only market share but also the cultural significance that makes their products unique. Cherry Blossom’s demise is a reminder that even longstanding traditions cannot survive without innovation and adaptability.
The confectionery industry is fiercely competitive, yet Canada has a proud history of producing beloved chocolate bars. Coffee Crisp, Aero, Caramilk, Big Turk, Oh Henry!, and Wunderbar continue to represent the diversity and creativity of Canadian confectionery. These treats have stood the test of time, but their survival is not guaranteed. Brands today must navigate a complex landscape shaped by evolving consumer preferences, social media trends, and health-conscious demands.
Cherry Blossom’s decline was further hastened by changes to its formulation. Over the years, its size shrank to 45 grams, and the texture and flavor evolved, leaving some long-time fans disappointed. Additives like Red Dye No. 3 also made the product less appealing to health-conscious consumers. While Cherry Blossom was never marketed as a health food, indulgence treats today face increased scrutiny.
Interestingly, some global chocolate brands, such as KitKat, Aero, and Caramilk, are still manufactured in Canada. Nestlé’s Toronto plant and Cadbury’s facilities continue to produce these favorites, showcasing the potential of Canadian food manufacturing when supported by robust demand and strategic investment. However, even these products are not immune to market pressures.
The question remains: could Cherry Blossom be saved? Perhaps a Canadian entrepreneur or company could revive the brand, bringing production back to Canada and reinvigorating its nostalgic appeal. Yet, without a concerted effort to prioritize food manufacturing, other iconic brands may meet the same fate. Food manufacturing in Canada must be viewed not just as an economic activity but as a cornerstone of national identity.
The end of Cherry Blossom may seem trivial—it is, after all, just a candy. But it serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges facing Canada’s food industry. If we value the cultural and economic significance of these products, we must ensure that food manufacturing remains a viable and competitive sector in Canada. Otherwise, Cherry Blossom will not be the last Canadian icon to disappear.
More Blog Posts In This Series
Plant-based milk: A question of fairness or hidden agendas?
Bills that should never have existed: How Ottawa’s chaos saved farmers and consumers
Canada needs an ‘axe the tax’ election—but not for the reasons you think
